Latest Development on May 17:Prof. Zhang Weiwei, a known Chinese expert on politics, says No More Rare Earth Metals for the U S Military. This will effectively slow weapons production for US & Israel. Editor's Comment: The so-called Rare Earth elements or Lanthanides are not as rare as their name might imply. They can be classified as Light Rare Earth elements (Lanthanum La, Cerium Ce, Praseodymium Pr, Neodymium Nd, Promethium Pm, Samarium Sm, Europium Eu) and Heavy Rare Earth elements (Gadolinium Gd, Terbium Tb, Dysprosium Dy, Holmium Ho, Erbium Er, Thulium Tm, Ytterbium Yb, Lutetium Lu). Because of their similarity, two other elements are usually added to these Lanthanide elements (Scandium Sc, Yttrium Y). For some special reason, it is their physical similarity that makes it difficult to separate and enrich them by chemical means. As a result, their individual properties are impossible to determine and apply in a specimen, usually containing all of them in a different content. Years ago, I had to analyze a specimen that contained all light rare earth elements at once, even the slightly radioactive Europium. They could be localized in small oxide particles embedded in a steel matrix. It can therefore be assumed that these particles served some metallurgical purpose. As a consequence, the real problem is not exploration and mining of rare earth minerals, but rather their separation and individual refinement in a complicated process that needs to be developed. In that field China has taken the lead. Information that US company Critical Metals recently secured control of one of the largest heavy rare earth deposits on earth in Greenland should therefore be seen as well from another point of view. |
US president Trump received at the airport by an employee of the Chinese President's office.
US-CHINA: THE SUMMIT OF TECHNOFEUDALISM
1/ The CEOs who traveled with Trump to China aren't his entourage; they are the Board of Directors of the new economic system dominated by the big tech corporations. Those that Varoufakis defined, warning us, as "Technofeudalists":
2/ When BlackRock, Apple, Nvidia, Goldman Sachs, and Tesla sit at a table with Xi Jinping, it's not about diplomacy—it's the 'board' of a nation whose president is merely the elected manager. A nation whose leadership no longer follows the outdated logics of democracy.
3/ This visit has ended the democratic illusion and the rhetoric of separation between State and Market. Foreign policy, as can be seen, is technological and isn't being decided in the State Department, but in the offices of those who manage the world's GDP.
[Quotations from the X-account of Adrián Ramírez, a journalist based in Buenos Aires and Madrid]
Trump in Beijing posing for the US Midterm Elections
Results of the Meeting:
The visit ends and the real inspection begins.
Trump has now left China, but the impact of the visit is just beginning to show.
If summed up in one sentence, the outcome of the visit was: Politically, the tone has been redefined, mechanisms have been set up on economic and trade, and communication has been resumed on security, but the agreement in substance remains to be seen.
This is not a summit to completely resolve the structural contradictions between China and the United States, nor is it a visit to publish a large-scale agreement package. It's more like a stability summit: Both sides realize that Sino-US relations cannot continue to be pushed out of control by the tariff war, the Taiwan issue, the technological blockade and the international crisis, so communication channels and negotiation frameworks need to be reset.
[Chinese Radio Seattle, US based station on May 15, 2026]
Deutsche Welle, German state TV discussing results of the US-China summit. President Xi invites Trump into the garden of his residency in Zhongnanhai, showing him trees that had already been growing for hundreds of years, at the time the United States of America were founded 250 years ago. On Trump's request, if there were regular diplomatic receptions in this hermetically sealed garden, Xi denied, then adding that only Putin had once been here.
Further News from Germany
● This week, national German media came with the news that Germany's Federal Agency for the Protection of the Constitution (BVS), the country's Secret Service for the Interior, decided to buy their new software system for screening terrorist elements and related dangers from another European partner in France. The US alternative Palantir was rejected.
In the decision against Palantir, promoted by US billionaire Peter Thiel, it should have played a key role that Thiel is known to be a prominent supporter of Donald Trump's MAGA movement. The Agency immediately played down such allegations, saying that they are continuously searching for reliable software in every direction, but the fact remains on the agenda.
● At a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg on May 12, Spain and Ireland renewed demands to halt the EU-Israel Association Agreement — the framework governing political dialogue and trade ties between the two sides since June 2000.
But the proposal ran into immediate resistance from Germany and Italy.
● In Germany, an increasing movement is opposing the suffocating need to avoid certain items in public discussion like the German-Israeli relations, at a time when Israeli shelling and the expulsion of Arab inhabitants from Ghaza and southern Lebanon is confirming the suspicion of Israel's genocidal intentions. [Public opinion polls]
Such German fears are partly related to a law, established only some years ago, where any kind of so-called “antisemitism“ is being accused. The law is an elaborated juridical construction, ready to be used against anybody who dares to utter more than a tiny word against Israel and the Jews. What is even more remarkable is the fact that a German minister (=> Greens party) from the lately outvoted coalition government publicly declared that Jewish rights in Israel and their protection by German authorities are obligatory for every German citizen and have to be seen as a “Reason of State“.
The official German position in daily politics is, therefore, still referring to the extermination of Jews under Nazi rule in the "holocaust", now 80 years ago.


























